Off The Wall
On The Record
Registered Sex Offenders for Edgefield
2005 Crime Stats
& Audio Updates
PO Box 972
State and Federal
Local Political Parties
Chamber of Commerce
New York Times
New York Post
Los Angeles Times
past articles please visit our Archives
The Emperor has no clothes
A Column by the Editor
posted February 5, 2009
COLUMN – As news reports document the
continued problems at Mt. Vintage and the empty promises by Bettis
Rainsford to those purchasing lots and the comments in the Wandering
Minds Section has come under fierce attack by Mr. Rainsford,
reply) and supporters of Mr. Rainsford. They tout the many good
that Mr. Rainsford has done for our county. Don’t ask me why, but the
song by Janet Jackson, “What have you done for me lately,” just popped
into my head.
I can tell you what Mt. Vintage and Bettis Rainsford has done for me
lately; they have provided an unparalleled amount of
news that is being
read far beyond the Edgefield County borders. I am getting email
across the southeast regarding the stories and the situation that is
taking place. I have even been contacted from readers “up north”.
That is a good thing for EdgefieldDaily.com, but it is a very bad thing
for our county and how we are perceived by others.
Some want to blame me personally for airing our dirty laundry out for
others to see. Well, quite honestly, I’m not the one that soiled the
diaper – I’m just the one that points out the baby needs changing.
Excuse me for caring.
My wife collects birdhouses in our kitchen. They line the walls,
counter tops, windowsills, and are above our cabinets. One reminds me
of Bettis Rainsford. It is a cat with the mouth of the cat as the
entrance, a sort of feline Hotel California where you can check out but
Aside from my personal view of Bettis Rainsford, what has he done for
the county lately?
He has taken up a majority of the time of the county council dealing
with dissatisfied property owners who complain that the county has not
enforced its laws when it came to Mt. Vintage and their dissatisfaction
of the lack of interest by the county council to rectify the situation.
That is bad enough. But now, because of the same empty promises by
Bettis Rainsford, the county has now been named as a defendant in a
legal action seeking damages. Gee, thanks Bettis, way to go.
As if our county does not have enough problems dealing with budget
shortfalls, we now have to expend funds to defend against a lawsuit
that is directly the fault of Rainsford’s “empty promises” and
“misrepresentations” since 2006.
The county council has voted to require a performance bond from Mt.
Vintage Development LLC to finish the required infrastructure at the
“New Nine”, but what fool will issue a bond they know would be called
due at the time it was issued? Hint – nobody.
It was proper for the county council to “request” the bond, but in
reality it was a moot point. There will be no bond in my opinion. What
the county needs to do is request that the 150% cost of completion of
the infrastructure be delivered to the county in cash so that the work
can be performed with proper oversight.
Of course, we’d have to hire someone to oversee that project as those
responsible to oversee it was done in the first place were abject
failures in performing their duties. Oh what a tangled web we weave.
I would also like to point out the arrogance of Bettis Rainsford for
not attending the past meeting of the county council when he knew they
would be addressing the problems he and his company created in this
county. I guess he was too busy dealing with the $660,000 lien and the
pending foreclosure on over $10 million in loans to be bothered with
having to answer tough questions.
County Council Chairman Monroe Kneece and County Attorney Buzzy Bird
wanted to lay all the blame on Rainsford and Mt. Vintage and informed
those who were implying they were going to sue to look beyond the
county saying that their problems were not the result or culpability of
I guess that the most recent court filing suggests otherwise.
Who will be the fall guy for the county? Will it be former County
Administrator Wayne Adams who had his head so far up Bettis’ butt that
when he sneezed Bettis farted? No.
Will it be Howard Gibson, the former Building and Planning Director who
was the puppet of Adams who was to assure Mt. Vintage Development
complied with the laws? No.
Will the county seek to find an innocent victim to be the scapegoat
rather than admit their incompetence? Absolutely.
The sad part is the person responsible for all of it, in my opinion, is
the one person who did not find it necessary to attend a meeting about
his actions – Bettis Rainsford. How far will the majority of the county
council go to protect their chosen one? The one they see as the giver
of all things good for the county.
The house of cards has begun to fall and the dominoes have been
aligned. How much this will cost the county is incalculable at this
point. However, Bettis Rainsford and his layers of LLC’s at Mt. Vintage
will escape the brunt of the costs. I believe we, the taxpayers, will
absorb the burden.
I hope I am wrong, but I fear I am correct.
© Copyright 2009
original material is property of
EdgefieldDaily.com and cannot be reproduced, rewritten or redistributed
without the expressed written permission of Edgefield Daily.com
JAM Straight Customs
We still need recipes for Cooking Section
WEBNEWS – Send in your favorite or
favorites. There is no limit to the number of recipes you can send in.
With the Editor’s wife being the driving force behind her own personal
section, help her create an exchange of local favorites, home cooking,
grilling, sauces, and deserts! Send in your submissions here.