Off The Wall
On The Record
Registered Sex Offenders for Edgefield
2005 Crime Stats
& Audio Updates
PO Box 972
State and Federal
Local Political Parties
Chamber of Commerce
New York Times
New York Post
Los Angeles Times
past articles please visit our Archives
Moving the trees to see the forest: County Councilwoman berates Editor
for "mean" article
A Column by the Editor
posted May 7, 2009
COLUMN – County Councilwoman Genia
Blackwell has expressed quite a bit of angst and anger over the report
of the county council’s decision to rebuild the Church Street building
at a location on Railroad Street. “It was mean,” Blackwell said
regarding the report. Mrs. Blackwell said that there was no vote taken
prior to the meeting on the matter. “We were aware there was a
proposal,” she said, “but we didn’t vote on anything until the meeting.”
According to Blackwell, Chairman Kneece simply “misspoke” when he
stated the council already decided to place the building there rather
than the Church Street property. The decision was made during the
meeting, she said, and there was nothing improper about the vote.
However the question raised at the meeting concerning the decision,
regardless of when it was made, was that the “decision” to place the
building on Railroad Street was presented from nowhere and as a
foregone conclusion. Which it turned out to be.
There has not been a single discussion about rebuilding the office
space in front of the public other than to discuss the amount of
insurance money from the fire that destroyed the Church Street building
and how it would be paid to the county and not where the building would
The county entered into a drive to purchase the Calliham building on
Penn Street which left the county council going behind closed doors to
discuss the matter. At one point the council voted to make an offer to
purchase the building for $425,000. With Mr. Calliham unable to produce
a clear title to the property, that effort was abandoned and the
property was eventually sold on the Courthouse steps in a foreclosure
sale for $50,000. The county did not bid on the property.
After the sale the county resurrected the plan to purchase the building
again, with all discussions being held behind closed doors. According
to numbers already released, the new owner would have increased his
investment in the property five times over.
After the issue was announced dead with a public vote to not move
forward, the dead rose again after a proposal lead by Edgefield Mayor
Ken Durham last month, which was shot down twice. Once to not purchase
the property and another vote to never bring the matter up again. If
you think that was the final push, keep reading.
The county has always held two options out, rebuilding on the Church
Street property or the purchase of the Calliham building. The public
was led to believe that those were the only real options, other than an
off record comment once that the county could consider building on
property owned on Star Road.
However, at the county council meeting Tuesday night the plan to build
on the Railroad Street property was well in place with aerial photos,
drawings showing the building’s location, and no other proposal or
option mentioned until Councilman Rodney Ashcraft brought up rebuilding
on the Church Street property.
That brought Edgefield Mayor Ken Durham into the conversation in which
he stated the county would have had to start rebuilding the structure
within six months due to setbacks used by the town. Though it was still
feasible even with the setback rules or by obtaining a variance from
the town to rebuild the building that burned, the discussion was put
down and the vote was held to build on the Railroad Street property.
The problem is that there has never been a public discussion involving
the public’s comments, concerns or desires held. Apparently the only
have been involved in the decision making process has been the
Edgefield County Council, Edgefield Mayor Ken Durham, the Calliham
family, and Bettis Rainsford.
Where were the taxpayers’ opinions and comments even taken into
consideration? They are the ones who own the properties and pay the
A larger question is, why on Railroad Street? According to Chairman
Monroe Kneece, it was chosen because people could walk between the
County Courthouse and the new building that will house other government
offices. The plan is to move other county offices out of the courthouse
due to security concerns, and relocate them into the new building.
If that were the case, it would matter little where the building was
located as people going to the courthouse would do so for matters
concerning court, recording deeds, or probate matters and not to pay
their taxes or register to vote.
Again, why Railroad Street?
It is more than blatantly obvious that Mayor Durham was adamant the
county purchase the Calliham property. A big push by Rainsford and
Durham was made to have the matter brought back up at the Tuesday night
meeting. Both attended the meeting and, if looks could kill, Councilman
Ashcraft would be on life support from the evil glare Rainsford was
giving him during the discussion on the Railroad Street property; it
was as if his child just disobeyed an order.
But there is a much larger picture that has to be viewed. It is a sort
of a, “you can’t see the forest for the trees” thing.
The fact of the matter is the Railroad Street property is the location
of the Sheriff’s Office and the Law Enforcement Center (LEC) containing
911 operations and the county jail, which will have to be expanded
within five years, an expansion that would be possible without the
purchase of the Calliham building, until now.
Now that the available space is being used to house the new office
building, those plans will be greatly altered. With the LEC not being
able to expand across the street, the expansion can only go in one
direction and that direction would then be pushed to require the
purchase of, guess what? The Calliham property.
Moreover, a bigger issue arises about the Church Street property. Why
was it never considered when that is where the office building was to
begin with? What plans are there for that property? And why would
Durham and Rainsford push so hard to make sure the building was never
replaced at that location?
Here is a hint. The property is a historical site.
Perhaps Councilwoman Blackwell is right, the article may have been
“mean” and maybe Chairman Kneece “misspoke” at the meeting.
I suppose he has been misspeaking every time the county council exits
executive sessions over the years to declare that “we decided” on the
matter held in private.
And perhaps all the things that have taken place are just by
happenstance with no desire to make sure that sometime, somehow, those
who are so adamant that the county buy the Calliham property get their
And to answer the many emails, yes, I am sleeping on the couch again
© Copyright 2009
original material is property of
EdgefieldDaily.com and cannot be reproduced, rewritten or redistributed
without the expressed written permission of Edgefield Daily.com
JAM Straight Customs
We still need recipes for Cooking Section
WEBNEWS – Send in your favorite or
favorites. There is no limit to the number of recipes you can send in.
With the Editor’s wife being the driving force behind her own personal
section, help her create an exchange of local favorites, home cooking,
grilling, sauces, and deserts! Send in your submissions here.