On The Record
Registered Sex Offenders for Edgefield
PO Box 972
Dr. Skip Myers
State and Federal
Local Political Parties
Chamber of Commerce
The Jail Report
New York Times
New York Post
Los Angeles Times
past articles please visit our Archives
Taking the Bait: Hunting Deer over Bait Moves towards House Vote
A Column by the Editor
web posted February 1, 2013
COLUMN – A bill that sped through the SC
Senate last week allowing hunting deer over bait, usually corn, is now
about to head to the full House for a vote after a 3-1 vote of a
wildlife subcommittee to move the bill forward. Rep. Bill Hixon, who
represents a portion of the Merriwether area and North Augusta, voted
to advance the ill-conceived bill. The legislature should be voting to
remove baiting deer in other parts of the state rather than making it
First of all, I find the wording very peculiar; "hunting over bait" is
not hunting, it is the regulated slaughter of our wildlife. And as
slippery slopes go, once it is legal to bait deer what is there to stop
baiting for other wildlife such as dove, turkey, quail, ducks,
squirrels, bear, alligators, and on down the line?
Secondly, sitting over a pile of corn to kill a deer requires one
skill, learning how to cut open a bag of corn feed.
The US Dept. of Interior has signs in every National Park stating that
visitors are not to feed the wild life because it makes the wildlife
less afraid of humans (a natural instinct for survival in the wild) and
lessens their ability to find natural sources of food on their own.
Something that is akin to the welfare state the federal government
pushes, but that is another column in and of
In conversations with Sen. Massey during the bill streaking through the
legislative body in about two weeks, he stated that there is "too much
money" in the Low country to get a bill passed banning baiting deer
there, so allowing baiting in the Upstate at least makes things fair
Sen. Massey voted against the bill's passage as did most of the Upstate
Senators in the 22-15 vote to approve.
I spoke briefly to Rep. Bill Clyburn on the matter Thursday and he was
unclear about how he would vote. He stated that he wanted to hear from
constituents in the area, most importantly hunters, not politicians.
Since the first
report of the bill was published by Edgefield Daily, calls, emails,
and personal encounters have been overwhelmingly against allowing
baiting. Several notable people from Edgefield County testified against
the bill in the House subcommittee on Wednesday, which passed the bill
on to the full house following the hearings.
The bill appears to be on a fast track for passage in the House as it
was in the Senate, however; now that the issue is in the public realm
the passage may slow down a bit. But I fear it will be controlled by
those in the lowstate who are protecting their right to hunt over bait
outnumbering those who support the obvious, hunting over bait is not
hunting and the practice should be outlawed across the state.
Contact you representatives and let them know your feelings on this
bill. I encourage you to ask them to vote no.
I remember a joke I heard when I was a young boy growing up in Trenton
that fits this rather well. A group of farmers got together and hired a
bunch of prostitutes and took them to a field where they had placed
large amounts of liquor and piles of cash as the "political season" got
underway. As the politicians swarmed the field the farmers sprang from
their blinds and started gunning down the politicians. They were all
arrested, not for shooting the pols, but for hunting over a baited
© Copyright 2012 - 2013 All material is property of
Edgefield Daily and/or parent company ECL and
cannot be reproduced,
redistributed without expressed written permission.