Featured Sections
Headlines
Opinion
Obituaries
Sports
Crime
Blotter
Happenings
Country Cooking
Wandering
Minds
Classifieds
Birthdays
Off The Wall
On The Record
Church Listings
Archives
Featured Columns
Pastor Howle
Wise
Tech
Tips
Editor's
Column
Carl Langley
Dr.
Skip Myers
Live WebCam
Edgefield
Square
Registered Sex Offenders for Edgefield
County
Contact us
Contact
Info
or
E-mail
the Editor
Phone:
803-634-0964 day
803-279-5041 eve
803-279-8943 fax
Mail to
EdgefieldDaily.com
PO Box 972
Edgefield SC
29824
Video
& Audio Updates
Audio Archive
Video
Archive
School
System
EC
District Office
School Board
Strom
Thurmond
Charter Schools
Fox
Creek
Private Schools
Wardlaw Academy
Public Offices
Edgefield County
Edgefield
Johnston
Trenton
Political
State and Federal
Legislative Contacts
Local Political Parties
Republican Party
Democrat
Party
Chamber of Commerce
Edgefield
County Chamber
Historical
Edgefield
Genealogical
Society
News
links
The
Citizen
News
Aiken
Standard
North
Augusta Star
The
State
Augusta
Chronicle
Atlanta Journal
United Press
Associated
Press
FOX News
Reuters
CNS News
WorldNet
Daily
Newsmax
Drudge Report
GoogleNews
Yahoo!News
New York Times
New York Post
Los Angeles Times
Washington Times
Washington
Post |
County Council meeting dominated by discussion over county funds
expended on private property for parks
web
posted February 3, 2010
EDGEFIELD – Edgefield County’s newly hired
County Administrator Alton Brown attended his first meeting Tuesday
night with County Council Vice-chairman Willie Bright chairing the
meeting since Chairman Monroe Kneece is still recovering from surgery.
In what appeared to be a short agenda and a short meeting turned into
over an hour of discussion which at times drew contentious remarks and
rebukes by Councilman Norman Dorn.
The first order of business was the first reading of the new
re-inspection fees that are to be collected by the Building and
Planning Department. Under the new provisions a secondary
re-inspections would not be charged a fee; however, subsequent
re-inspections of the same problem will be met with a nominal fee. The
first reading passed unanimously.
The first reading of a new Animal Cruelty was withdrawn from the agenda
by Councilman Rodney Ashcraft. He explained that at the present time he
wanted to look at the current ordinances and offer “changes or
amendments” in order to accomplish the goal set forth in the proposed
ordinance.
The council also unanimously approved a resolution in support of the
Burton Center for Disabilities and Special Needs to obtain a bus.
Under new business was the consideration to place a mapping machine
once used by the Assessors Office for sale out for bids. The machine
was replaced several years ago. Councilwoman Blackwell asked why the
machine had not been placed for sale long before now. No answer was
given. “I say let’s get rid of it,” she said and made a motion on the
same, which also carried a unanimous vote.
The planned budget workshop and passage schedule was also approved with
the following dates:
March 25: County Council Work Session
April 4: First Reading of Budget
April 20: Second Work Session
May 4: Second Reading of Budget / Public Hearing
May 18: Third Work Session
June 1: Final Reading and passage of the Budget
The council also approved the low bid for removal of the bats at the
Edgefield Library and awarded the work to Trutech Inc. for $3,420. The
two other bids received were $4,590 and $10,875 respectively.
Old business included the county being awarded a grant of $48,000 to
replace heating and cooling units at the Edgefield County Detention
Center and the Sheriff’s Office. Building Director Mike Reed explained
they asked for a total of $55,000 to replace all the units but the
request was rejected. Under the approved grant the county could replace
five units in the Detention Center and move one of the units replace
over to the Sheriff’s Office. The additional working units could be
used at the Calliham building when remodeling begins there for county
offices.
The consideration to approve a title change of an officer in the
Veteran Affairs Office was approved with the understanding that no pay
increase would be included under the title change until the next fiscal
year.
Vice-chairman Bright then recognized Administrator Brown welcoming him
to the county and was joined by other members of the county council
with similar comments. Councilwoman Blackwell recognized Clerk to
Council Barbara Stark for her service over the past months as interim
administrator taking on responsibilities above and beyond her normal
duties, “It’s been wonderful,” Blackwell said, which drew a round of
applause.
The chair then recognized guests who signed up to speak with the first
being Jerry Galloy of the Edgefield Community Development Association.
Mr. Galloy informed the county council of the celebration the Edgefield
town business owners have planned for the year and requested funding
for the celebration in the amount of $2,500.
The group has a planned a “225th Birthday” celebration of the formation
of the Old Edgefield District and the formation of the Town of
Edgefield on March 12, 1785 that will kick off on March 20 at the
Kendall Mill followed by a “Town Picnic” and fireworks in July and a
“Chili Cook-off with children’s activities in the town in the fall.
Vice-chairman Bright suggested that the request be taken in as
information and brought up for a vote in the March meeting. Mr. Galloy
thanked the council for their consideration of the request.
The next speaker, Arthur Biggs, drew the ire of Councilman Norman Dorn
and Vice-chair Bright when he suggested the county council refrain from
spending Edgefield County taxpayer dollars to improve property the
county does not own. Mr. Biggs stated he was a strong supporter of
parks and recreation and expending funds to enhance parks in the
county.
Mr. Biggs stated that he would like to see the county council refrain
from spending local taxpayer dollars to improve property the county
does not own. His main premise was if the owners of the properties of
the Northside and Bettis Parks were willing to lease the county the
property for up to 40 years for a dollar a year, “they should be
willing to sell the property for a dollar.”
“I was concerned that we are going to spend money on land and put
structures on land that is not owned y the county,” Mr. Biggs said. He
stated he supported improving the parks, but stated it did not make any
sense to him to funnel money to properties the county does not own.
The county cannot receive grant money to improve the parks because the
land is leased, which places the burden of improvements of the parks on
the county taxpayers backs.
“I personally have a problem putting county money on to leased
property,” Mr. Briggs said.
Vice-chairman Bright stated that if the county had to purchase the
property “we would never get a park here.” Councilman Dorn interjected
similar comments on the property where the Northside Park is located.
Mr. Briggs stated he understood but did not see the difference of the
landowners leasing the land for up to 40 years for a dollar a year and
not being willing to donate the land to the county.
Councilmen Dorn and Bright ignored the premise of the question and
instead went on to state that the county would have to purchase the
property at a much higher price. Briggs countered that if the owners
were willing to lease the property for decades, he did not see why the
owners would not just donate the property unless they had an underlying
reasons for not doing so, which he did not suggest was an issue.
Councilman Dorn went on the defense and seemed to attack Mr.
Briggs for his assertions and stated that because his family owned
property in the county for over a hundred years he did not see the need
to listen to someone who has not lived in the county very long.
Mr. Briggs stated he was not trying to “be adversarial” as Mr. Dorn
began a barrage of what was often times ambiguous and incomprehensible
comments directed at him personally.
Briggs stated he was in support of a strong recreation program but he
did not understand the problem with the county trying to protect the
investment of taxpayers’ dollars on improvements to private property.
A member of the public asked the question of what would happen to the
over $500,000 worth of improvements to the two county parks, including
structures, if the leases were broken by either party. Councilman Dorn
said, “Don’t even answer that stupid question.” The question was
reiterated to Vice-chairman Bright who stated the property owner would
take ownership of the property and the improvements paid for by the
county.
As the debate grew more contentious on behalf of Councilman Dorn,
Vice-chairman Bright asked for a motion to adjourn, which was approved
and the meeting ended.
For all
past articles please visit our Archives
© Copyright 2010
EdgefieldDaily.com All
original material is property of
EdgefieldDaily.com and cannot be reproduced, rewritten or redistributed
without the expressed written permission of Edgefield Daily.com
|
NOTICE:
We still need recipes for Cooking Section
WEBNEWS – Send in your favorite or
favorites. There is no limit to the number of recipes you can send in.
With the Editor’s wife being the driving force behind her own personal
section, help her create an exchange of local favorites, home cooking,
grilling, sauces, and deserts! Send in your submissions here.
|