Featured Sections
Headlines
Opinion
Obituaries
Sports
Crime
Blotter
Happenings
Country Cooking
Wandering
Minds
Classifieds
Birthdays
Off The Wall
On The Record
Church Listings
Archives
Featured Columns
Pastor Howle
Wise
Tech
Tips
Editor's Column
Carl Langley
Dr. Skip Myers
Live WebCam
Edgefield Square
Registered Sex Offenders for Edgefield
County
Contact us
Contact Info
or
E-mail the Editor
Phone:
803-634-0964 day
803-279-5041 eve
803-279-8943 fax
Mail to
EdgefieldDaily.com
PO Box 972
Edgefield SC
29824
Video
&
Audio
Updates
Audio Archive
Video
Archive
School
System
EC
District
Office
School Board
Strom
Thurmond
Charter Schools
Fox Creek
Private Schools
Wardlaw Academy
Public Offices
Edgefield County
Edgefield
Johnston
Trenton
Political
State and Federal
Legislative Contacts
Local Political Parties
Republican Party
Democrat
Party
Chamber of Commerce
Edgefield
County
Chamber
Historical
Edgefield
Genealogical
Society
News
links
The
Citizen News
Aiken
Standard
North
Augusta
Star
The
State
Augusta
Chronicle
Atlanta Journal
United Press
Associated Press
FOX News
Reuters
CNS News
WorldNet
Daily
Newsmax
Drudge Report
GoogleNews
Yahoo!News
New York Times
New York Post
Los Angeles Times
Washington Times
Washington
Post |
County Administrator claims “hostile work environment”: threatens
lawsuit
web posted July 7, 2010
EDGEFIELD – The Edgefield County Council meeting
Tuesday night was full of surprises over the entire two hours the
meeting drug onward. Though much of the business was simple reading on
ordinances drawing unanimous votes, a third reading on the Planned
Development ordinance failed for a lack of motion and the proposed
ordinance to create business licenses for all business in Edgefield
County was accepted only as information. However, the real fireworks
did not start to go off until late in the meeting with County
Administrator Alton Brown making accusations of a “hostile work
environment” and announcing plans to seek other avenues of employment
for his future.
The first statements by Brown came an hour into the meeting saying
Councilman Rodney Ashcraft had sent him a list of questions regarding
the process that had been undertaken on the Calliham project and Brown
felt the need to answer them publicly, rather than privately to all
members of the council. Brown stated that ordinarily he would respond
to the question emailed to him to all council members in like form, but
due to his not responding in time, he wanted to do so at the meeting.
Administrator Brown made several assertions during his replies and
directed them at Councilman Ashcraft mainly including a question as to
if the administrator or the council chairman can take individual action
without a vote of the council. Brown referred to Robert’s Rules of
Order, which the council has recently codified in ordinance form, and
stated that a directive did not have to come in the form of a vote
citing Article 8 Section 46 on voting.
Brown stated that “general consent” states, “that the chair may take
action under the rule of general unanimous or silent consent, this
means, and I’m paraphrasing now, that the chair may assume the general
or unanimous consent of a decision, directive, ect, by the council’s
silence or lack of timely objection.”
Brown said Chairman Kneece could give directive where there is no
disagreement among members. “So if the chairman says, ‘Alton, do this,
and nobody objects or the remaining council is silent we assume (he and
staff) that is a directive of the council.”
However, the questions sent privately to Administrator Brown in an
email, were issues that have never been addressed by the county council
in an open meeting and Mr. Brown did not receive any such “directive”
by Chairman Kneece on any of the matters contained in the questions by
Councilman Ashcraft.
“The council decided to forego the hiring of a contractor to save
money,” Mr. Brown stated. However, no such statement, conversation, or
directive was given by Chairman Kneece in any meeting prior to Mr.
Ashcraft submitting his questions to Mr. Brown or afterwards. Brown
stated the council did vote on the replacement of the roof, but never
recalled any discussion as to what Building and Planning Director Mike
Reed’s title was in connection to the project that has been the topic
of much discussion in the public realm.
“The council simply approved it,” Brown said.
Councilman Ashcraft interrupted Mr. Brown to state that twice he
mentioned “kickbacks” were alleged to being made to Mr. Reed and asked
for clarification of the accusations. Brown ignored the question and
continued in his reading of the questions submitted to him by
Councilman Ashcraft.
The question arose again by Councilman Norman Dorn later in which
Administrator Brown stated, “Well, it was in twice. First in the Daily
Edge (Edgefield Daily presumably) um, he was quoted, uh, that it was,
that, uh that, uh, Mr. Reed, and then you questioned him about it on
the 25th,” Brown said. Brown then asked if Councilman Ashcraft
questioned Mr. Reed on the matter of receiving “kickbacks” on June 25
and Ashcraft answered, “No”.
No such quote by Councilman Ashcraft exists in any report by Edgefield
Daily or any other media provider and we are unaware of any
confidential exchanges between Councilman Ashcraft, Mr. Reed and
Administrator Brown concerning such allegations.
Building and Planning Director Mike Reed then rose to speak and was
told by Administrator Brown that he “did not have to defend himself”.
Reed took to the podium to state that Councilman Ashcraft never accused
him of taking kickbacks and that during a discussion Councilman
Ashcraft asked him about something constituents had asked him about the
possibility that kickbacks could be involved.
Councilman Ashcraft stated he did not recall any such conversation and
said he was only asking questions to Administrator Brown to receive
answers posed to him by his constituents. Mr. Reed agreed and stated
that he never said Ashcraft made the allegations and it was just a
friendly conversation.
Councilwoman Genia Blackwell then interjected that she did not believe
anyone had any question about Reed’s integrity, “I think you are an
outstanding person and very honest. My concern is your overload. You
know, how much you can take on in a 35 to 40 hour work week.”
Mr. Reed responded by saying that the project has drawn out for too
long and due to the procurement processes it is taking even longer than
it should for a remodel of a 4,000 square foot building. “As far as
overworked, it just makes the day go by faster,” Reed said. “If it
wouldn’t be this it would be something else,” he said.
Chairman Kneece spoke up saying that if Councilman Ashcraft did not
agree with the Calliham project he should just “step aside” and then
turned his comments towards Edgefield Daily Editor Roy Blackwell. “You
just need to stay out of it.” Blackwell responded, “All I do is ask
questions and I will continue to do so.” Kneece shot back that
Blackwell needed to ask questions and “not invent questions.”
County Councilman Norman Dorn interjected, “yeah, and get a job”.
Mr. Blackwell responded, “I ask questions and quote you accurately,
what else am I to do?”
Chairman Kneece stated everyone is making a “mountain out of a mole
hill”.
Vice-chairman Willie Bright then interjected that he wanted to
apologize to Mr. Reed for being accuse of being a thief. “I don’t think
a
man ought to call a man a thief unless he can prove it,” Bright said.
This drew the ire of Councilman Ashcraft.
“Mr. Bright, are you accusing me of calling Mr. Reed a thief?” Ashcraft
shot back. Chairman Kneece gaveled down the discussion and stated he
was “taking control” only to be interrupted by Councilman Ashcraft.
“Those questions, a few of them came from me, but a lot of them came
from people in the community. Now, if I’m going to be accused and
sacrificed tonight for asking those questions, then I will be accused
and sacrificed every night.” Ashcraft said he apologized to Mr. Reed if
the questions were misdirected as accusations by others, but he never
insinuated that Mr. Reed was taking kickbacks. Mr. Reed confirmed again
that Mr. Ashcraft never made the accusations that were leveled
previously.
“All of a sudden what you’re telling me is different from what’s coming
from both sides of me (Brown, Kneece, and Bright) which is I’m being
accused of calling you a thief,” Ashcraft said. “But that’s not the
case at all.”
Ashcraft continued, “If I’m going to ask questions that my constituents
have, and I’m going to be in trouble for it, I will be in trouble every
thirty days.”
As the meeting moved forward Mr. Reed began discussing the floor plan
the current bids were being accepted on which drew a comment by
Councilman Ashcraft stating that he did not recall a vote in any vote
by the council to approve the plans. Mr. Reed stated that the initial
plans supplied to the council were only preliminary and that the
current plan was just recently submitted. Chairman Kneece stated that
the plans were approved by the Building and Planning Department and
Voter Registration.
Councilman Ashcraft interjected saying, “Like Mr. Brown said, if the
Chairman says for you to do something, and we concede and not object,
then I guess it’s unwritten law, semantics, as he (Administrator Brown)
says, but I don’t recall even verbally agreeing to these plans.
Chairman Kneece interjected that Building and department heads in
Planning as well as Voter Registration are the ones who “accepted this
plan”. Ashcraft continued to say that the county council has never
voted to accept the floor plan and never voted to accept it as the
final plan to accept bids.
Subsequently Mr. Reed read off several bids for work on the new
building saying that bids submitted by bidders outside the county had
to be “increased” under a new formula to make local contractors more
competitive. One woman in the audience questioned why other bids were
being increased over their submitted bids in order to favor a local
contractor.
Reed stated that there was “an adjustment” that is allowed under a new
ordinance designed to give local contractors an even playing field with
outside bidders to help keep the contracts being awarded to local
contractors. In the new ordinance, it applies a percentage depending on
the dollar amount of the local bidder, you increase the bid of the
competitor to try to compensate, uh, to put a dollar amount into that
uh bid to (inaudible) for a local bidder.”
“So you increase the (bids) others,” Reed said.
The county council approved the acceptance of a plumbing contract,
however, other bids were discussed but were unambiguous as to if the
bids were awarded or not.
The discussion turned to the removal of Railroad Street from the state
road system that runs from the corner of the Calliham building to Jeter
Street. Chairman Kneece stated that the Sheriff has requested the
street be closed for several years. Councilwoman Blackwell questioned
the Sheriff’s claimed need to close the street. County Administrator
Alton Brown stated it was due to more space needed to park “more junk
cars”, something he claimed was made in jest.
The vote to request the removal of the road from the state system was
approved with the understanding that it could be withdrawn at a later
date.
At the closing of the meeting Administrator Brown made the statement
that he said needed to be made due to a “hostile work environment”
concerning his job.
Mr. Brown made accusations that due to comments in opinion postings by
the Editor of Edgefield Daily, which he misquoted and took out of
context, and subsequently referred to members of council, who have no
editorial control over Edgefield Daily, which he considered them to
infer he was being placed in a “hostile work environment” and
constituted
grounds for legal action against the county.
He informed the council that he would be seeking other employment
opportunities and was not ruling out legal action against the county,
going so far as to place the county on notice of his intentions.
“I am not resigning”, Brown said. However, he alleged that Edgefield
Daily had implied “corruption” and illegal “kickbacks” (which have
never been mentioned or reported by Edgefield Daily), “without offering
any documentation.” Since no such articles have been published it is
unclear what Mr. Brown was referring to in his complaint.
All documented and sourced reports on the hostile work environment
reported concerned the lawsuit filed by Edgefield County Building and
Planning Director Mike Reed against Aiken County as reported by the
Aiken Standard, not Administrator Brown, against the county of Aiken,
not Edgefield.
Mr. Brown went on to misquote an opinion by the Editor in an effort to
imply that there was collusion between sitting council members and a
current county council candidate (which could be construed as a
political attack on one of his future employers as well as two sitting
council members re-elected to their current positions) by the employee
(ie: Alton Brown).
Edgefield Daily stands by the opinion of the Editor on the outcome of
the coming elections and what that could mean for Mr. Brown and other
positions directly related to their “at will” hiring’s.
Opinions of an independent new organization have no bearing on his job,
his employment status, or his professional standing.
For all
past articles please visit our Archives
© Copyright 2010 EdgefieldDaily.com All original
material is property of EdgefieldDaily.com and cannot be reproduced,
rewritten or
redistributed without the expressed written permission of Edgefield Daily.com
|
NOTICE:
We still need recipes for Cooking Section
WEBNEWS – Send in your favorite or
favorites. There is no limit to the number of recipes you can send in.
With the Editor’s wife being the driving force behind her own personal
section, help her create an exchange of local favorites, home cooking,
grilling, sauces, and deserts! Send in your submissions here.
|