EdgefieldDaily.com               "Edgefield County as it Happens"

Featured
Sections

Headlines
Opinion
Obituaries
Sports
Crime Blotter
Happenings
Country Cooking
Wandering Minds
Classifieds
Birthdays 

Off The Wall
On The Record
Archives
Church Listings

Live WebCam
Edgefield Square



Featured Columns

Tech Tips
Carl Langley
Editor's Column
Dr. Skip Myers
Pastor Williams


Registered Sex Offenders for Edgefield County

2005 Crime Stats

Video & Audio Updates
Audio Archive
(Testing)
Video Archive

Contact us
Contact Info
or
E-mail the Editor
Phone:
803-634-0964 day
803-279-5041 eve
803-279-8943 fax

Mail to
EdgefieldDaily.com
PO Box 972
Edgefield SC
29824


School System
EC District Office
School Board
Strom Thurmond

Charter Schools
Fox Creek

Private Schools

Wardlaw Academy

Public Offices
Edgefield County
Edgefield
Johnston
Trenton

Political
State and Federal Legislative Contacts

Local Political Parties
Republican Party
Democrat Party

Chamber of Commerce
Edgefield County Chamber

Historical

Edgefield Genealogical
Society


News links    
The Citizen News
Aiken Standard
North Augusta Star
The State
Augusta Chronicle
Atlanta  Journal
United Press
Associated Press
FOX News
Reuters
CNS News
WorldNet Daily
Newsmax
Drudge Report
GoogleNews
Yahoo!News
New York Times
New York Post
Los Angeles Times
Washington Times
Washington Post





County Councilman offers “Animal Protection” ordinance for consideration


web posted December 23, 2009
COUNTY – A county councilman has initiated an Animal Protection ordinance for Edgefield County that could be up for discussion in February. District 2 Councilman Rodney Ashcraft sent the draft to County Attorney Michael Medlock to be worded in ordinance form on Tuesday. “I don’t expect this to be the wording of the ordinance,” Ashcraft said. “But I think it is a starting point and will at least get a discussion going.”

Councilman Ashcraft has asked that the information be included with the packets for each member of the county council in time for the January 5 meeting. Ashcraft said he was not asking for the matter to be placed on the agenda, it was to inform the rest of council of his intentions and to get the input of the other county council members in drafting the final ordinance.

Although almost everything in the proposed ordinance is presently codified in Title 47 of the South Carolina Code of Laws, it does become more restrictive in defining types of restraints and tethers. Unreasonable restraints are listed as, “chain of a weight heavier than weight of dog, tether or chain that can tangle, choke or restrict animal's ability to reach food, water and shelter, length of restraint too short to provide appropriate movement and activity. Attachment of restraint to an inappropriate item not made for or intended to be around the animal's neck (i.e.-rope, string, chain, wire, plastic cord)”, read the draft copy obtained.

According to the draft document, the ordinance would also give law enforcement, acting in the capacity of animal control, to immediately enter upon property and seize an animal with or without owner’s consent or presence if the animal falls under the protections of the ill treatments as defined in state law and those of the proposed ordinance.  

Edgefield County Attorney Michael Medlock said he received the draft and was in the process of reviewing the information. He said the penalties imposed by the county cannot be criminal, only civil, but fines could be imposed. Criminal penalties would still have to be brought through the state code of laws.

Asked if the county could impose stricter regulation than state law provides Mr. Medlock said, “That’s something I am looking into now.” Medlock said he was preparing a brief to be presented to the county council on current ordinances because many impose criminal penalties. According to Mr. Medlock, the South Carolina Supreme Court has struck such locals laws down as unconstitutional when imposing criminal penalties not defined in the state code.

However, that did not mean the ordinance could not move forward, Mr. Medlock said. The ordinance could define the local laws on a civil court basis in Magistrate Court and impose the criminal penalties using state law. 

Councilman Ashcraft said the purpose of the ordinance was to give Sheriff Adell Dobey’s Animal Control the ability to move more rapidly in animal abuse cases in the county.

Seizure of an animal:
Under the seizure clause the draft stated, “Any animal control officer may lawfully remove any animal found abandoned, neglected, or cruelly treated or unfit for use. In the case of an absent owner the officer may leave notice in a visible place for the owner or guardian of animal/property to contact animal control within twenty-four (24) hours and shall petition any magistrates’ court in the jury area wherein the animal is found, for a hearing which shall be a civil proceeding.”

The hearing would have to be held within ten days and the owner would be judged as to fitness to have or control the animal seized.




For all past articles please visit our Archives

 © Copyright 2009 EdgefieldDaily.com  All original material is property of EdgefieldDaily.com and cannot be reproduced, rewritten or redistributed without the expressed written permission of Edgefield Daily.com

NOTICE:
We still need recipes for Cooking Section

WEBNEWS –  Send in your favorite or favorites. There is no limit to the number of recipes you can send in. With the Editor’s wife being the driving force behind her own personal section, help her create an exchange of local favorites, home cooking, grilling, sauces, and deserts!  Send in your submissions here.