Featured
Sections
Headlines
Opinion
Obituaries
Sports
Crime
Blotter
Happenings
Country Cooking
Wandering
Minds
Classifieds
Birthdays
Off The Wall
On The Record
Archives
Church
Listings
Live WebCam
Edgefield
Square
Featured Columns
Tech
Tips
Carl Langley
Editor's
Column
Dr.
Skip Myers
Pastor Williams
Registered Sex Offenders for Edgefield
County
2005 Crime Stats
Video
& Audio Updates
Audio Archive
(Testing)
Video
Archive
Contact us
Contact
Info
or
E-mail
the Editor
Phone:
803-634-0964 day
803-279-5041 eve
803-279-8943 fax
Mail to
EdgefieldDaily.com
PO Box 972
Edgefield SC
29824
School System
EC
District Office
School Board
Strom
Thurmond
Charter Schools
Fox
Creek
Private Schools
Wardlaw Academy
Public Offices
Edgefield County
Edgefield
Johnston
Trenton
Political
State and Federal
Legislative Contacts
Local Political Parties
Republican Party
Democrat Party
Chamber of Commerce
Edgefield
County Chamber
Historical
Edgefield
Genealogical
Society
News
links
The
Citizen
News
Aiken
Standard
North
Augusta Star
The
State
Augusta
Chronicle
Atlanta Journal
United Press
Associated
Press
FOX News
Reuters
CNS News
WorldNet
Daily
Newsmax
Drudge Report
GoogleNews
Yahoo!News
New York Times
New York Post
Los Angeles Times
Washington Times
Washington
Post |
County Councilman offers “Animal Protection” ordinance for consideration
web
posted December 23, 2009
COUNTY – A county councilman has initiated
an Animal Protection ordinance for Edgefield County that could be up
for discussion in February. District 2 Councilman Rodney Ashcraft sent
the draft to County Attorney Michael Medlock to be worded in ordinance
form on Tuesday. “I don’t expect this to be the wording of the
ordinance,” Ashcraft said. “But I think it is a starting point and will
at least get a discussion going.”
Councilman Ashcraft has asked that the information be included with the
packets for each member of the county council in time for the January 5
meeting. Ashcraft said he was not asking for the matter to be placed on
the agenda, it was to inform the rest of council of his intentions and
to get the input of the other county council members in drafting the
final ordinance.
Although almost everything in the proposed ordinance is presently
codified in Title
47 of the South Carolina Code of Laws, it does become more
restrictive in defining types of restraints and tethers. Unreasonable
restraints are listed as, “chain of a weight heavier than weight of
dog, tether or chain that can tangle, choke or restrict animal's
ability to reach food, water and shelter, length of restraint too short
to provide appropriate movement and activity. Attachment of restraint
to an inappropriate item not made for or intended to be around the
animal's neck (i.e.-rope, string, chain, wire, plastic cord)”, read the
draft copy obtained.
According to the draft document, the ordinance would also give law
enforcement, acting in the capacity of animal control, to immediately
enter upon property and seize an animal with or without owner’s consent
or presence if the animal falls under the protections of the ill
treatments as defined in state law and those of the proposed
ordinance.
Edgefield County Attorney Michael Medlock said he received the draft
and was in the process of reviewing the information. He said the
penalties imposed by the county cannot be criminal, only civil, but
fines could be imposed. Criminal penalties would still have to be
brought through the state code of laws.
Asked if the county could impose stricter regulation than state law
provides Mr. Medlock said, “That’s something I am looking into now.”
Medlock said he was preparing a brief to be presented to the county
council on current ordinances because many impose criminal penalties.
According to Mr. Medlock, the South Carolina Supreme Court has struck
such locals laws down as unconstitutional when imposing criminal
penalties not defined in the state code.
However, that did not mean the ordinance could not move forward, Mr.
Medlock said. The ordinance could define the local laws on a civil
court basis in Magistrate Court and impose the criminal penalties using
state law.
Councilman Ashcraft said the purpose of the ordinance was to give
Sheriff Adell Dobey’s Animal Control the ability to move more rapidly
in animal abuse cases in the county.
Seizure of an animal:
Under the seizure clause the draft stated, “Any animal control officer
may lawfully remove any animal found abandoned, neglected, or cruelly
treated or unfit for use. In the case of an absent owner the officer
may leave notice in a visible place for the owner or guardian of
animal/property to contact animal control within twenty-four (24) hours
and shall petition any magistrates’ court in the jury area wherein the
animal is found, for a hearing which shall be a civil proceeding.”
The hearing would have to be held within ten days and the owner would
be judged as to fitness to have or control the animal seized.
For all
past articles please visit our Archives
© Copyright 2009
EdgefieldDaily.com All
original material is property of
EdgefieldDaily.com and cannot be reproduced, rewritten or redistributed
without the expressed written permission of Edgefield Daily.com
|
NOTICE:
We still need recipes for Cooking Section
WEBNEWS – Send in your favorite or
favorites. There is no limit to the number of recipes you can send in.
With the Editor’s wife being the driving force behind her own personal
section, help her create an exchange of local favorites, home cooking,
grilling, sauces, and deserts! Send in your submissions here.
|