EdgefieldDaily.com               "Edgefield County as it Happens"

Featured
Sections

Headlines
Opinion
Obituaries NEW!
Sports
Crime Blotter
Stolen Property
Happenings
Country Cooking
Wandering Minds
Classifieds
Birthdays  NEW!

Off The Wall
Cartoons
On The Record
Archives

Church Listings



Featured Columns
Dr. Myers
Carl Langley
Editor's Column


Registered Sex Offenders for Edgefield County

2005 Crime Stats

Video & Audio Updates
Audio Archive
(Testing)
Video Archive

Contact us
Contact Info
or
E-mail the Editor
Phone:
803-634-0964 day
803-279-5041 eve
803-279-8943 fax

Mail to
EdgefieldDaily.com
PO Box 972
Edgefield SC
29824


School System
EC District Office
School Board
Strom Thurmond

Charter Schools
Fox Creek

Private Schools

Wardlaw Academy

Public Offices
Edgefield County
Edgefield
Johnston
Trenton

Political
State and Federal Legislative Contacts

Local Political Parties
Republican Party
Democrat Party

Chamber of Commerce
Edgefield County Chamber

Historical

Edgefield Genealogical
Society


News links    
Edgefield Advertiser
The Citizen News
Aiken Standard
North Augusta Star
The State
Augusta Chronicle
Atlanta  Journal
United Press
Associated Press
FOX News
Reuters
CNS News
WorldNet Daily
Newsmax
Drudge Report
GoogleNews
Yahoo!News
New York Times
New York Post
Los Angeles Times
Washington Times
Washington Post

...



Editorial

Is building purchase "lose-lose" for county taxpayers?


web posted January 16, 2008
OPINION – Is the just revealed plan of purchasing the property presently owned by J.P. Calliham worth the $450,000 price? Maybe so, but is it the right thing to do with insurance money? Probably not. The building owned by the county that housed several county offices and the Senior Citizens Building was razed by fire last year. The insurance settlement is reported to be over $600,000, more than enough to rebuild the building. To protect county assets the building should be rebuilt. Should the county also look at buying the Calliham property? Absolutely, but shorting one asset for another is a lose lose situation for the county taxpayer.

Rebuilding the property with a new $600,000 building would raise the property value to at least one million dollars. By not rebuilding the property value is greatly reduced and the county will take a loss when the property is sold, missing out on an opportunity to have available retail or office space available for rent or collecting on the increased value of the property.

The county should seek to buy the Calliham property for logistical reasons, but not by using insurance money intended to replace a county building destroyed by fire.

With the Edgefield County Council reserving over $100,000 a year in miscellaneous expenditures, the property could be purchased and paid for in just six years. The near 50-year-old building would have to be demolished, including the current warehouse, to make room for the expansion of the jail, which would have the county pouring money into a building they do not intend to keep intact.

That seems to be pouring good money into a bad situation when renovations made will be destroyed when the complete occupation of the property is final. Benefiting the contractor, not the county.

The remarks of County Council Chairman Monroe Kneece at the January 8 meeting claiming insurance would not provide enough money to rebuild the property is obviously mistaken. Protecting the investment of county taxpayer interests in the Church Street property should also be first and foremost on the minds of our county leaders.

Chairman Kneece and Administrator Pettigrew remained largely evasive and unresponsive as to future plans of the Church Street property. This leaves questions open as to why and who may be interested in the property for development purposes.

We agree that the county should move forward on the purchase of the Calliham property, but not by devaluing property that is not only desirable but also prime for development.

Rebuild the building and then sell the property at a profit, not a loss. It seems the county is trying to pull a bait and switch with a good idea shielding a really bad idea. In the end, the taxpayer loses in both propositions.
 




For all past articles please visit our Archives

 © Copyright 2007 EdgefieldDaily.com  All original material is property of EdgefieldDaily.com and cannot be reproduced, rewritten or redistributed without the expressed written permission of Edgefield Daily.com
EdgefieldDaily.com is a member of the
Edgefield County

New Link Below
Information and Activities







Parting Shots
A new book by Columnist Carl Langley

-------

JAM Straight Customs


Featured Dining

La Cantina




'08 Debate
Get involved


NOTICE:
We still need recipes for Cooking Section

WEBNEWS –  Send in your favorite or favorites. There is no limit to the number of recipes you can send in. With the Editor’s wife being the driving force behind her own personal section, help her create an exchange of local favorites, home cooking, grilling, sauces, and deserts!  Send in your submissions here.