"Edgefield County as it Happens"

Sections
Headlines
Opinion

Obituaries
Sports
Crime Blotter
Happenings
Country Cooking
Wandering Minds
Classifieds
On The Record
Church Listings
Archives

Featured Columns
Pastor Howle
Tech Professor
Life Down South
Editor's Column






Registered Sex Offenders for Edgefield County

Contact us
Contact Info
Phone:
803-634-0964 day
803-279-5041 eve
803-279-8943 fax

Mail to
EdgefieldDaily.com
PO Box 972
Edgefield SC
29824


Archived Columns
Carl Langley
Wise Tech Tips
Dr. Skip Myers
School System
EC District Office
School Board
Strom Thurmond

Charter Schools
Fox Creek

Private Schools

Wardlaw Academy

Public Offices
Edgefield County
Edgefield
Johnston
Trenton

Political
State and Federal Legislative Contacts

Local Political Parties
Republican Party
Democrat Party
Rep Women of EC

Chamber of Commerce
Edgefield County Chamber

Historical

Edgefield Genealogical
Society



News links    
The Jail Report
Aiken Standard

North Augusta Star
The State
Augusta Chronicle
Atlanta  Journal
United Press
Associated Press
FOX News
Reuters
CNS News
WorldNet Daily
Newsmax
Drudge Report
GoogleNews
Yahoo!News
New York Times
New York Post
Los Angeles Times
Washington Times
Washington Post







Letter to the Editor

Writer Disagrees with "Tech Professor" George Craig's "Net Neutrality" Column


web posted March 25, 2015
Dear Editor,
I am terribly disappointed in "Tech Professor" George Craig's posting about "Net Neutrality."  It misses the point completely.

"Net Neutrality" is a high-sounding misnomer for heavy-handed government regulation of the internet.  Instead of the free interchange of ideas, goods, and services, "Net Neutrality" puts the government in charge of determining what is "fair" in terms of the free market that the internet has become.

We've seen this movie before.  The same government agency that will now police the internet had given us the "Fairness Doctrine" of the 1960's.  That was so "fair" that it virtually shut down any kind of free exchange of ideas on the airwaves.

When the government intrudes into any area on the premise of "making things fair," it instead bastardizes (good word, look it up) the marketplace of ideas, goods and services.  If we were to apply the concepts of "Net Neutrality" to the grocery marketplace, it would require Kroger, Bi-Lo, and "Bob's Neighborhood Groceries" to sell everything at the same price, or sell the same amount of goods, or operate from the same size stores, all under the guise of "fairness."

I don't want government attempting to "level the playing field" for me--as a consumer I want to make that choice myself, even if it means a higher price for something I particularly want.  I don't want government determining for me who the winners and losers are, or even who the players are.  I can make up my own mind--I'm not stupid and don't need the government to make my choices for me.

Calling it "Net Neutrality" is merely applying a high-sounding name to politically-driven government interference (all government interference is politically-driven) in the internet marketplace.  One might say that the Internet is the perfect example of the success of the free marketplace because there is no government regulation.  We must be careful of names, especially those applied by government and politicians (remember the "Affordable" Care Act?).  Just because I call my horse a guinea pig doesn't make it one--it's still a horse.

Mr. Craig is simply wrong about this.  Every time the free marketplace has been allowed to operate without regulation, the consumer benefits (remember the deregulation of the telephone system that gave us wireless communication technologies?).  Net Neutrality is a very bad idea.  We must fight it all the way.

Richard Virgilio
Merriwether



Have a comment on this story? Email the Editor with your comment to be placed in the Wandering Minds reader comment page.

For all past articles please visit our Archives

Copyright 2015 - All material is property of Edgefield Daily and/or parent company ECL and cannot be reproduced, rewritten or redistributed without expressed written permission.












+