"Edgefield County as it Happens"

Sections
Headlines
Opinion

Obituaries
Sports
Crime Blotter
Happenings
Country Cooking
Wandering Minds
Classifieds
Birthdays 
On The Record
Church Listings
Archives

Featured Columns
Pastor Howle
Editor's Column



Registered Sex Offenders for Edgefield County

Contact us
Contact Info
Phone:
803-634-0964 day
803-279-5041 eve
803-279-8943 fax

Mail to
EdgefieldDaily.com
PO Box 972
Edgefield SC
29824


Archived Columns
Carl Langley
Wise Tech Tips
Dr. Skip Myers
School System
EC District Office
School Board
Strom Thurmond

Charter Schools
Fox Creek

Private Schools

Wardlaw Academy

Public Offices
Edgefield County
Edgefield
Johnston
Trenton

Political
State and Federal Legislative Contacts

Local Political Parties
Republican Party
Democrat Party
Rep Women of EC

Chamber of Commerce
Edgefield County Chamber

Historical

Edgefield Genealogical
Society



News links    
The Citizen News
The Jail Report
Aiken Standard

North Augusta Star
The State
Augusta Chronicle
Atlanta  Journal
United Press
Associated Press
FOX News
Reuters
CNS News
WorldNet Daily
Newsmax
Drudge Report
GoogleNews
Yahoo!News
New York Times
New York Post
Los Angeles Times
Washington Times
Washington Post







"Flow Control" Bill on Solid Waste Could Devastate County Budgets

web posted February 22, 2013

COLUMBIA – A Bill that has already passed the SC House is in the Senate, and if passed it would have devastating consequences on counties across the state, especially Edgefield County. H. 3290 Flow Control would eradicate counties from being able to enter into controls on disposal of the solid waste generated by residents, dissolve local county ordinances allowed under Home Rule, and prevent counties from collecting garbage fees to pay for decades long contracts already issued with promises to pay. In Edgefield County that cost is roughly $900,000 of an $8 million budget each year.

"The proposed legislation (H. 3290 & S. 203) could potentially impact the County. The proposed legislation states that it would void solid waste fee ordinances. The County currently collects roughly $900,000 in solid waste fees to fund the maintenance and operation of the convenience centers, as well as disposal of the waste," Edgefield County Administrator Lynn Strom said Thursday.

Under the current ordinances long term problems could go on for an additional 14 years, which would, at the $900,000 a year contract, cost the county $12.6 million in debt with no way to fund its payment. Bonds issued based on these contracts also come into play.

"The contract with Three Rivers is a 30 year contract that was signed in 1997," Administrator Strom said. "Edgefield County’s obligation is 10,000 tons of waste per year (price per ton changes periodically). From what I have been told, the contract would still have to be met even if this bill passes. Three Rivers has over $50 million in revenue bonds based on expected revenues from each of the nine counties over the life of this contract."

Mrs. Strom said Three Rivers is actively working to defeat this legislation. "This act could have a devastating impact on counties all over the state."

"Our attorney is in contact with other attorneys across the state and they are looking into this closely to see what funding and operational options the County would have if this passes," Mrs. Strom said.

The critical issues in the bill are identified by the South Carolina Association of Counties (SCAC) as follows:

•    It forbids any current or future county ordinances directing where waste or recyclables go. For example, typical franchise agreements that state where materials must be taken, minimum tonnage agreements with collection or disposal authorities, or even ordinances requiring waste put into receptacles or left at convenience centers go to the county landfill or transfer station would no longer be allowed.   
•    Uniform service charges for solid waste or recycling services could be in jeopardy if ordinances can no longer direct that the services be used by those paying the charges.   
•    Any future or outstanding bonds for solid waste or recycling programs or facilities would be significantly impacted by this legislation.  
•    This deprives counties of an essential mechanism for funding solid waste and recycling obligations that counties have planned for and invested in as mandated by the Solid Waste Planning and Management Act. (S.C. Code 44-96-10 et. seq.)    
•    Passage of this legislation would set a dangerous precedent. What if a for-profit utility doesn't like a local government providing a service to citizens? Should decades of planning and investment decision made publicly on behalf of the citizens be overridden in this way?  
•    Federal law forces strict liability on all solid waste generators, transporters or financially involved parties. Counties and cities have been held liable by the courts numerous times under the federal Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The ability to direct the flow of solid waste is essential in limiting the taxpayers' exposure to this liability.

House Representative Bill Hixon (R-North Augusta), who represents a portion of Merriwether, voted in favor of the bill and has not returned a call for comment at press time to explain his support of the bill.

Sen. Shane Massey said he feels the "brakes" have been applied on passage of the bill once it hit the Senate Committee. "The Senate is a much more deliberative body," Sen. Massey said. A similar bill was stopped last year in the Senate with just the objection by Horry County. I don't think this bill has a chance to pass in its current form," Massey said. As written, "Taxpayers would be on the hook for default payments (of revenue bonds passed in good faith)," Massey said

Now that Three Rivers, who represents contracts in nine counties - including Edgefield County - has gotten involved, "You're talking about a third of the state," Massey said. "I don't see it happening in its current form."

Sen. Massey said there could also be a "constitutional conflict" in the way the proposed law affects the Home Rule Act of 1976, which allows counties to enter into contracts and self govern without state intervention.

At this time it is unknown if the bill will move out of committee for a full vote. If it does, Sen. Massey remains fairly confident it will not pass as written.



For all past articles please visit our Archives

© Copyright 2012 - 2013 All material is property of Edgefield Daily and/or parent company ECL and cannot be reproduced, rewritten or redistributed without expressed written permission.